🎉 [Gate 30 Million Milestone] Share Your Gate Moment & Win Exclusive Gifts!
Gate has surpassed 30M users worldwide — not just a number, but a journey we've built together.
Remember the thrill of opening your first account, or the Gate merch that’s been part of your daily life?
📸 Join the #MyGateMoment# campaign!
Share your story on Gate Square, and embrace the next 30 million together!
✅ How to Participate:
1️⃣ Post a photo or video with Gate elements
2️⃣ Add #MyGateMoment# and share your story, wishes, or thoughts
3️⃣ Share your post on Twitter (X) — top 10 views will get extra rewards!
👉
Legendary Angel Investor Criticizes MicroStrategy's Bitcoin Policy: Could Disrupt the Game! - Coin Bulletin
Jason Calacanis, considered one of the most successful angel investors in the world, suggested that MicroStrategy's massive Bitcoin purchases could 'disrupt the game of Bitcoin'.
Under the leadership of Michael Saylor, MicroStrategy is currently the largest corporate Bitcoin holder in the world, with approximately $43.4 billion worth of Bitcoin. While the company's strategy has increased institutional interest in Bitcoin, some experts believe that this situation could have negative effects in the long run.
According to information conveyed by Barron's, MicroStrategy shareholders can vote to increase the company's authorized share count to over 10 billion. This could theoretically pave the way for MicroStrategy to purchase all the BTC in the market.
Calacanis pointed out the negative aspect of this
Please provide the text to be translated. Calacanis sees MicroStrategy's massive purchases as a potential risk for the Bitcoin ecosystem. According to him, the company's accumulation of Bitcoin on this scale may deter future new Bitcoin buyers from investing in this asset. Please provide the text to be translated. Calacanis, stating that "Everyone will rightfully think they work for Saylor," argued that MicroStrategy's effect on Bitcoin could in the long term direct investors to other alternatives. In particular, it is stated that establishing such a large dominance by a single player could undermine Bitcoin's vision of decentralization.