Solana SIMD-0228 Proposal: The Survival Threshold for Validators and the Network’s Future
Background of the proposal and core contradictions
The SIMD-0228 proposal plans to reduce the inflation rate of the Solana network, alleviating token dilution pressure, but at the same time weakening the inflation rewards for validators, which may lead to a significant decline in income for small and medium-sized validators, and even their exit from the network, threatening decentralization.
validators profit structure analysis
Validator income mainly comes from inflation rewards (about 60-70%), transaction fees, and MEV profits. After the proposal is implemented, inflation rewards will be greatly reduced, and the model shows that validators ranked in the lower middle will face losses, with only large validators able to survive.
Operating costs and pressure
The annual cost of running a validator node is about $85,000, including hardware, bandwidth, and voting costs. A decline in revenue will make it difficult for lower-ranked validators to cover costs, forcing them to exit and further exacerbating the risk of network centralization.
Community disputes and compromise suggestions
Supporters believe that reducing inflation helps enhance the value of tokens and market competitiveness, while opponents are concerned about centralization and security issues. Recommendations include first lowering voting fees and dynamically adjusting the inflation rate to balance economic sustainability and decentralization.
The number of validators and network health
Solana has about 1800 active validators, a number far exceeding other public chains. Too many validators may lead to reduced efficiency, and high inflation, while maintaining quantity, harms the interests of token holders. The community needs to seek a balance between security, decentralization, and economic benefits.
Conclusion
The SIMD-0228 proposal reveals the contradiction between maintaining decentralization and economic incentives in PoS public chains. In the short term, reducing inflation may boost the price of SOL, but the risk of validator attrition cannot be ignored. Investors should pay attention to the progress of the proposal and rationally assess risks and opportunities.
Solana SIMD-0228 Proposal: The Survival Threshold for Validators and the Network’s Future
Background of the proposal and core contradictions
validators profit structure analysis
Operating costs and pressure
Community disputes and compromise suggestions
The number of validators and network health
Conclusion
Background of the proposal and core contradictions
The SIMD-0228 proposal plans to reduce the inflation rate of the Solana network, alleviating token dilution pressure, but at the same time weakening the inflation rewards for validators, which may lead to a significant decline in income for small and medium-sized validators, and even their exit from the network, threatening decentralization.
validators profit structure analysis
Validator income mainly comes from inflation rewards (about 60-70%), transaction fees, and MEV profits. After the proposal is implemented, inflation rewards will be greatly reduced, and the model shows that validators ranked in the lower middle will face losses, with only large validators able to survive.
Operating costs and pressure
The annual cost of running a validator node is about $85,000, including hardware, bandwidth, and voting costs. A decline in revenue will make it difficult for lower-ranked validators to cover costs, forcing them to exit and further exacerbating the risk of network centralization.
Community disputes and compromise suggestions
Supporters believe that reducing inflation helps enhance the value of tokens and market competitiveness, while opponents are concerned about centralization and security issues. Recommendations include first lowering voting fees and dynamically adjusting the inflation rate to balance economic sustainability and decentralization.
The number of validators and network health
Solana has about 1800 active validators, a number far exceeding other public chains. Too many validators may lead to reduced efficiency, and high inflation, while maintaining quantity, harms the interests of token holders. The community needs to seek a balance between security, decentralization, and economic benefits.
Conclusion
The SIMD-0228 proposal reveals the contradiction between maintaining decentralization and economic incentives in PoS public chains. In the short term, reducing inflation may boost the price of SOL, but the risk of validator attrition cannot be ignored. Investors should pay attention to the progress of the proposal and rationally assess risks and opportunities.